Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive11.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '23 at 16:20
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 198
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 407
46% 361 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.2% Average
Lighting 52.4
Reflection 67.4
Parallax 57.9
43% 59.2 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 54.8
Splatting 53.1
47% 58.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 1TB 1TB
497GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 342 250 14 15 18 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.3% Very poor
Read 57.4
Write 9.2
Mixed 12.4
SusWrite 108
10% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 251%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JHD2400U1716JY 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 18.3
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 19.3
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 3R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 29% 14 187 10 60 34.1" 2560 1009 GSM7715 LG HDR WFHD
Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback