Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 29 '23 at 14:50
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 95.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 194
78% 132 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 627
60% 495 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1543 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.42
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.9% Below average
Lighting 40.3
Reflection 42.5
Parallax 36.5
33% 39.8 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 52.1
Splatting 49.4
36% 42.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
451GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 591 591 587 582 585 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 667
Write 604
Mixed 630
SusWrite 561
139% 615 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 64.8
213% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 774
DQ Write 591
DQ Mixed 757
546% 708 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 158%
Great: 477%
Sandisk SD6SA1M032G 32GB
19GB free
Firmware: X211200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 76 76 76 72 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.4% Above average
Read 334
Write 72.9
Mixed 110
SusWrite 73.8
32% 148 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 28.2
101% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 77
DQ Mixed 93.9
82% 126 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 60%
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50
594GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10002
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 14,512
Mixed 55.7
5,206% 7,284 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 50%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
207GB free
Firmware: AM0B1J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 101 102 101 102 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 98.2
Write 85.8
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 98.7
57% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 60%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
6GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 3.1 3.1 3.1 3 3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 250
Write 3
SusWrite 2.9
58% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 76.4
4K Mixed 0
425% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
75.4% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 24.5
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 31.5" 1536 793 MEIA0C9 Panasonic-TV
Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 1,722 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 - $162

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $810
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback