Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '23 at 13:39
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 97.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 231
86% 150 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 510
59% 460 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1463 MHz, MLim: 1757 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.8% Above average
Lighting 75.4
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 77.8
61% 61.7 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 63.8
Splatting 66
45% 52.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 585 612 648 650 649 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 631
Write 582
Mixed 609
SusWrite 605
137% 607 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 67.3
212% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 549
DQ Write 487
DQ Mixed 552
405% 529 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 152%
Great: 477%
Sandisk SD6SA1M032G 32GB
15GB free
Firmware: X211200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 76 77 77 77 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62% Good
Read 384
Write 75.8
Mixed 112
SusWrite 76
35% 162 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 31.2
115% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 77.4
DQ Mixed 93.8
83% 127 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62%
Great: 60%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
360GB free
Firmware: AM0B1J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 110 114 113 113 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 93.9
Write 103
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 109
62% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 60%
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50
594GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 87 89 88 89 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 106
Write 38.7
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 87.3
53% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 50%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 888GB
768GB free, PID 2101
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 35.3
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 37.9
40% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
23% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 25.5
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 25.5
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 49.1
81% 49.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 18 200 24 60 31.5" 1536 864 MEIA0C9 Panasonic-TV
Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 1,722 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 - $162

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $810
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback