Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '23 at 13:34
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 97.6
1-Core 121
2-Core 219
85% 146 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 585
62% 495 Pts
64-Core 612
38% 612 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1543 MHz, MLim: 1827 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.5% Below average
Lighting 27.1
Reflection 26.1
Parallax 84.5
22% 45.9 fps
MRender 81.3
Gravity 34.1
Splatting 58.2
47% 57.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 564 593 627 642 641 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 634
Write 626
Mixed 614
SusWrite 579
138% 614 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 68
217% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 575
DQ Write 502
DQ Mixed 542
405% 540 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 153%
Great: 477%
Sandisk SD6SA1M032G 32GB
20GB free
Firmware: X211200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 75 75 76 77 77 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.7% Above average
Read 335
Write 73.2
Mixed 109
SusWrite 74.6
32% 148 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 30.1
104% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 76.5
DQ Mixed 92.6
82% 127 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 60%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
365GB free
Firmware: AM0B1J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 100 100 100 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 81.7
Write 88.8
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 96.9
55% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 60%
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50
596GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 89 88 89 89 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 109
Write 31.5
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 86.9
53% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 50%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 888GB
769GB free, PID 2101
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 38 38 39 39 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 54.9
Write 25.4
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 37.7
40% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
21% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 24.7
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 24.9
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 47.9
84% 47.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 48 60 31.5" 1536 793 MEIA0C9 Panasonic-TV
Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 1,722 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 5 - $162

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $810
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback