Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZM_FX517ZM

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	90.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZM_FX517ZM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX517ZM
Memory	16 GB free of 24 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230628
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 27 '23 at 14:11
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-12650H 16,339 User benchmarks, average bench 96% U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	58.5% Above average	Memory 59.2 1-Core 93 2-Core 181 61% 111 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 540 52% 426 Pts	64-Core 861 53% 861 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop) 102,706 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 1C6C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2137 MHz, MLim: 3033 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.45 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.7% Outstanding	Lighting 119 Reflection 115 Parallax 116 97% 117 fps	MRender 123 Gravity 94 Splatting 78.2 78% 98.5 fps
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 105%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B00 1TB 3,489 User benchmarks, average bench 208% 400GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXM7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 863 890 586 82 261 263 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 1,044 Write 665 Mixed 899 SusWrite 491 173% 775 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 39.1 4K Mixed 31.9 103% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 274 193% 249 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 289%
Nvme CT2000P 2TB 547 User benchmarks, average bench 226% 428GB free Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1705 826 237 238 244 173 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	155% Outstanding	Read 1,016 Write 1587 Mixed 1,247 SusWrite 570 250% 1,105 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 84 4K Mixed 56.8 181% 60.9 MB/s	DQ Read 551 DQ Write 474 DQ Mixed 545 400% 523 MB/s
Poor: 113% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 319%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G Skill Intl F5-4800S4039A16Hynix HMCG66MEBSA092N 24GB 4800, 4800 MHz 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	121% Outstanding	MC Read 51.2 MC Write 49.5 MC Mixed 44.2 138% 48.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 23.6 SC Mixed 21 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	8	105	53	165	15.5"	1280 720	CMN1540

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZM_FX517ZM Builds (Compare 1,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 91%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX517ZM_FX517ZM

CPU
Core i7-12650HIntelBench 96%, 16,339 samples	1,408x
Core i5-12450HIntelBench 89%, 9,550 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	860x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 11%, 18,986 samples	673x
RTX 3090-TiNvidiaBench 232%, 16,406 samples	2x

SSD
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	611x
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBNvmeBench 225%, 10,852 samples	290x
SAMSUNG MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B00 1TBNvmeBench 208%, 3,489 samples	263x

RAM
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GBSamsungBench 120%, 26,893 samples	761x
HMCG66MEBSA092N 2x8GBHynixBench 121%, 4,275 samples	135x
M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 1x16GBSamsungBench 70%, 2,622 samples	99x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16