Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics88% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive345% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 GAMING X
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '23 at 10:05
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 152
2-Core 305
101% 184 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 1,114
103% 858 Pts
64-Core 1148
71% 1148 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Gigabyte(1458 37D9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 158
Parallax 104
90% 124 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 97.9
Splatting 90.2
84% 105 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
513GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1410 1791 1899 1914 1917 1884 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 2,348
Write 2,281
Mixed 1681
SusWrite 1,802
456% 2,028 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 64.3
224% 84.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,806
DQ Write 1434
DQ Mixed 1,320
1,070% 1,520 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 345%
Great: 488%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2018)-$59
47GB free
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1630
Write 1,370
Mixed 1,262
316% 1,420 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 63.1
222% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 855
DQ Write 1,332
DQ Mixed 790
683% 992 MB/s
Poor: 141% Great: 228%
NetacPortableSSD 512GB
458GB free
Firmware: 1000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 406 405 405 402 399 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 400
Write 385
Mixed 377
SusWrite 404
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 25.2
114% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 122
107% 160 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
437GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 148 146 150 148 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 157
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 146
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3600 C17 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 41.6
MC Mixed 32.9
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 45.2
SC Mixed 30.4
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 106%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 65: 0P 5R 10G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
65% 50% 50 525 416 240 27" 1920 1080 BNQ7F60 ZOWIE XL LCD
History: Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B | Score 65: 0P 5R 10G 10B
Typical GA-Z390 GAMING X-CF Builds (Compare 12,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X - $225

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $806
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback