Gigabyte GA-B560M DS3H V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B560M DS3H V2  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210618
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateSep 23 '23 at 06:09
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$126
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 88.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 244
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 751
74% 606 Pts
64-Core 982
61% 982 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1273
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.1% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 7.4
5% 7.53 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 12.3
8% 9.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.1%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
859GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1775 1797 1769 1608 1562 1573 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 1,372
Write 1,877
Mixed 1,534
SusWrite 1,681
366% 1,616 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 65.1
213% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,095
DQ Write 891
DQ Mixed 1,000
747% 996 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 268%
Great: 365%
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
90GB free
Firmware: SN07373
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 103 106 105 101 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.4% Average
Read 40.3
Write 112
Mixed 139
SusWrite 104
23% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 27.5
90% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 74.2
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 81.9
64% 86.6 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 98%
Toshiba MG04ACA400E 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: FP4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 185 186 181 187 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 172
Mixed 87
SusWrite 184
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.1
235% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
309GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 138 140 140 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 156
Write 136
Mixed 96.6
SusWrite 139
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
TwinMOS DDR4 8GB 3200MHz 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.1% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 15.8
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 19.4
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 75 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical GA-B560M DS3H V2 Builds (Compare 5,875 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B560M DS3H V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback