Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '23 at 23:09
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 192
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 626
58% 485 Pts
64-Core 639
40% 639 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.5% Below average
Lighting 42.7
Reflection 65.2
Parallax 40.8
35% 49.6 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 35.6
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00BH1 512GB
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1NFAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 872 951 889 716 807 156 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,442
Write 1,223
Mixed 1,204
SusWrite 732
258% 1,150 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 58.4
199% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 959
DQ Write 883
DQ Mixed 967
713% 936 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 205%
Great: 217%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GU7CJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
46.9% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 14.4
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 53 60 18.5" 1280 720 DELF065 DELL E1916H
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback