HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Plus v2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Plus v2  (all builds)
MotherboardHPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Plus v2
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '23 at 09:20
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G6405
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28% Poor
Memory 30.5
1-Core 49.1
2-Core 64.3
29% 48 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 194
21% 166 Pts
64-Core 247
15% 247 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 28%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HPE LOGICAL VOLUME 480GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 108 105 96 123 115 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.9% Below average
Read 133
Write 127
Mixed 102
SusWrite 107
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 8.4
33% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 160
130% 190 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 100%
HPE LOGICAL VOLUME 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 5.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 31 28 35 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.3% Average
Read 134
Write 34.6
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 30.9
45% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GU7CJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 15 12 32 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback