Acer Aspire A515-56G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-56G  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Iris_TL
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230224
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 20 '23 at 10:12
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 135
2-Core 244
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 594
66% 520 Pts
64-Core 589
36% 589 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1464) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 18
Parallax 21.5
10% 17.4 fps
MRender 17.4
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 15.5
15% 18.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2450_MTFDKBA512TFK 512GB
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,210
Write 1,343
Mixed 1,025
267% 1,193 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 56.1
198% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 755
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 627
447% 581 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.9% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 23.5
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 39.4
SC Mixed 18.2
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1536 793 CMN1543
Typical Aspire A515-56G Builds (Compare 1,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-56G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback