Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111012
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '23 at 20:33
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 77.9 1-Core 56.5 2-Core 106 51% 80.2 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 264 29% 227 Pts	64-Core 259 16% 259 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C0B6) 2GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.58% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 1.4 2% 1.87 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.58% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 4.2 5.1 2.7 2.7 143 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 425 Write 309 Mixed 311 SusWrite 54.8 61% 275 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 26.2 4K Mixed 15.4 52% 17.9 MB/s	DQ Read 29 DQ Write 66.6 DQ Mixed 44.6 35% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 55%
Samsung HN-M500MBB 500GB-$80 4,322 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 411GB free Firmware: 2AR10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 100 103 103 103 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 103 Write 73.2 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 101 61% 82.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AD73I1C1674EV Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.2 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 11.7 34% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 82.5 48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	36	30	60	15.5"	1366 768	SEC324A

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B Builds (Compare 292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B

CPU
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	64x
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples	58x
Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples	47x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	162x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	69x
GeForce GT 520MXNvidiaBench 2%, 1,577 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	25x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	7x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	20x
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	16x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 36%, 2,424 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $228

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16