Medion MR Prof. i72000/B668

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion MR Prof. i72000/B668  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-CM2
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 10:38
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 109
2-Core 201
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 577
57% 468 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Zotac(19DA 1630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 171
Parallax 165
148% 172 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 135
Splatting 115
115% 145 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 129%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT2101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 56 48 38 33 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 399
Write 93.2
Mixed 131
SusWrite 45.2
36% 167 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 18.3
73% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 30.5
DQ Mixed 41.6
45% 79.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
200GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 189 192 202 203 195 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 124
Write 91.5
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 195
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
129GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 99 99 100 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 104
Write 64
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 99.4
62% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 84.3
48% 84.3 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 16 165 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 Q27G2G3R3B
Typical MR Prof. i72000/B668 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Medion MR Prof. i72000/B668

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $262
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback