Medion MR Prof. i72000/B668

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion MR Prof. i72000/B668  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-CM2
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 09:36
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 73%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 194
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 564
55% 451 Pts
64-Core 541
34% 541 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Zotac(19DA 1630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 170
Parallax 182
147% 178 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 134
Splatting 105
111% 141 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 128%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT2101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 33 33 32 30 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 428
Write 51.5
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 32.7
30% 142 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 22.5
4K Mixed 16.3
65% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 17.4
DQ Mixed 41.9
44% 76.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
200GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 199 197 199 202 199 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 132
Write 101
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 199
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
129GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 94 93 95 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 120
Write 41.6
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 94.2
58% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
115% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
29.5% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 8.7
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 165 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 Q27G2G3R3B
Typical MR Prof. i72000/B668 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Medion MR Prof. i72000/B668

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $262
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback