Lenovo 10RSS03D00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemLenovo 10RSS03D00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3136
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230612
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 17 '23 at 17:14
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 237
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 739
72% 589 Pts
64-Core 771
48% 771 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
24% Poor
Lighting 31
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 27.3
25% 29.3 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 28.7
Splatting 25.2
22% 26.6 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
879GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR402 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,398
Write 2187
Mixed 1,740
469% 2,108 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 59.7
194% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 950
DQ Write 677
DQ Mixed 934
665% 854 MB/s
Poor: 215% Great: 537%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA266.M16FJ 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 28.6
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 25
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1920 1009 SAM7312 S27C31x
Typical 10RSS03D00 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 10RSS03D00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 152% - Outstanding Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback