Performance Results

Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 10SC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R5  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '23 at 01:46
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 56
1-Core 42.7
2-Core 129
43% 75.9 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 362
33% 278 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12F4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
4.43% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 30
Parallax 5.8
3% 13.3 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 5
Splatting 7.7
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.43%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1032 256GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21111000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 147 147 141 146 151 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 547
Write 158
Mixed 232
SusWrite 147
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 28
60% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 182
142% 199 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 187%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
512GB free
Firmware: UH4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 157 189 190 202 198 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.9% Poor
Read 228
Write 177
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 181
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 3.3
12% 3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA266.M16FJ 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 10.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 51 60 15.5" 1536 864 AUO21ED
Typical MS-16R5 Builds (Compare 4,860 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop 74%
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R5

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback