Acer Aspire V3-772

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-772  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HW
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131011
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 16 '23 at 16:04
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 69.3
2-Core 129
55% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 80.1
8-Core 94.4
11% 87.2 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M
Acer(1025 0781) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
7.8% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 10.6
8% 9.4 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 9.8
8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.8%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0809
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 162 142 145 145 146 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.4% Average
Read 248
Write 161
Mixed 185
SusWrite 147
42% 185 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 14
63% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 56.2
60% 101 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 HMT351S6CFR8C-PB M471B5173BH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.4% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 12.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 10
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 96.5
42% 96.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 34: 0P 2R 6G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
34% 13% 111 150 58 60 17.3" 1280 720 CMN1735
Typical Aspire V3-772 Builds (Compare 416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-772

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback