Acer Aspire V3-772

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive15.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-772  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HW
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20131011
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 21 '23 at 02:00
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 75.8
1-Core 36.1
2-Core 70.9
42% 60.9 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 236
23% 187 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0781) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.41% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 2.5
1% 4.1 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 0.9
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.41%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0809
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 77 78 70 76 70 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.7% Very poor
Read 72.6
Write 58.6
Mixed 96.3
SusWrite 77.3
17% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 4.4
18% 6.37 MB/s
DQ Read 71.9
DQ Write 45.3
DQ Mixed 42.3
36% 53.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 HMT351S6CFR8C-PB M471B5173BH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.2% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 5.6
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 62 114 41 60 17.3" 1280 720 CMN1735
Typical Aspire V3-772 Builds (Compare 416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-772

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback