Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 105% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 106% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	83 GB free of 96 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230615
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '23 at 02:39
Run Duration	462 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$161 17,091 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Memory 80.6 1-Core 163 2-Core 321 100% 188 Pts	4-Core 612 8-Core 1,118 104% 865 Pts	64-Core 1,443 89% 1,443 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$283 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% MSI(1462 397B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.99 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Lighting 137 Reflection 122 Parallax 128 112% 129 fps	MRender 146 Gravity 105 Splatting 90.1 90% 114 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB 6,135 User benchmarks, average bench 368% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 234200WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1618 1700 1721 1730 1762 1770 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	277% Outstanding	Read 2,339 Write 2036 Mixed 1,927 SusWrite 1,717 450% 2,005 MB/s	4K Read 51.2 4K Write 58.3 4K Mixed 48 170% 52.5 MB/s	DQ Read 984 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 339 311% 501 MB/s
Poor: 206% ↑ This bench: 277% Great: 469%
WDC WDBA3V0010BNC-WRSN 1TB 5,585 User benchmarks, average bench 224% 141GB free Firmware: 211210WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 1350 838 837 831 837 828 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	190% Outstanding	Read 1576 Write 1,830 Mixed 1,456 SusWrite 920 326% 1,446 MB/s	4K Read 45.5 4K Write 51.8 4K Mixed 46.2 156% 47.8 MB/s	DQ Read 877 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 225 234% 406 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 274%
WDC WDS1 00T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 532GB free Firmware: X611 SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 421 420 413 418 382 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Read 475 Write 418 Mixed 321 SusWrite 409 91% 406 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 32.5 111% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 195 138% 179 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 108%
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N0 4TB 2,601 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 673GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 92 97 100 102 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 128 Write 117 Mixed 75 SusWrite 99.1 24% 105 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 10 4K Mixed 1.1 15% 5.43 MB/s	DQ Read 1.3 DQ Write 13.3 DQ Mixed 1.4 3% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 38%
WDC WD60EFAX-68JH4N0 6TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 63 61 58 63 61 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	10.7% Very poor	Read 103 Write 115 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 60.1 19% 86 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 1 9% 4.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1.2 DQ Write 12.9 DQ Mixed 2.1 3% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 73%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 4TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 115 143 143 146 143 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.7% Poor	Read 169 Write 149 Mixed 98.1 SusWrite 138 31% 138 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 8.5 4K Mixed 1.1 38% 10.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1.4 DQ Write 13.6 DQ Mixed 2.1 3% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 75%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 4TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 116 143 143 147 142 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.3% Very poor	Read 180 Write 158 Mixed 93.4 SusWrite 138 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 8.7 4K Mixed 1.2 12% 4.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1.6 DQ Write 14.8 DQ Mixed 1.7 3% 6.03 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 75%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 145 144 145 146 141 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Read 150 Write 150 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 143 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 96%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: 82.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 130 133 133 132 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 129 Write 132 Mixed 101 SusWrite 132 91% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3TB free Firmware: 82.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 133 134 136 135 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	69% Good	Read 106 Write 104 Mixed 85.6 SusWrite 135 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 100%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 250GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 73 74 73 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 142 Write 135 Mixed 106 SusWrite 73.8 85% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 86%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 928GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 132 134 131 133 133 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Read 105 Write 99.2 Mixed 66.1 SusWrite 131 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 101%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$39 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 378GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 64 62 59 64 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 116 Write 121 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 60.8 69% 93.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 784GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 64 62 59 64 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 118 Write 114 Mixed 75.8 SusWrite 61 68% 92.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 84%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 601GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 64 62 59 64 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 92.2 Write 93.2 Mixed 49.2 SusWrite 61 54% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 Crucial BL16G32C16U4B.16FE CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 Crucial BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 95GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 32767, 16384, 32767, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	103% Outstanding	MC Read 38 MC Write 38 MC Mixed 33.3 104% 36.4 GB/s	SC Read 31.2 SC Write 44.7 SC Mixed 34.5 105% 36.8 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	28.6"	1280 720	SAM1015 LU28R55

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,747 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 182%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 181%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,343x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,059x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	884x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	511x
RTX 3070Nvidia $455Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	402x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $479Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	362x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	438x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	385x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $159Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	207x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	159x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	125x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	117x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $1,186

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $251	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16