Asus VC65

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus VC65  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK VC65
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '23 at 16:31
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400T
1151p, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 151
52% 92.9 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 284
36% 274 Pts
64-Core 282
17% 282 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Intel(8086 1912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.34% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 3
4% 3.73 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 8.5
5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.34%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 109 14 16 27 32 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.2% Very poor
Read 75.8
Write 81
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 60.4
17% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 4.9
23% 7.63 MB/s
DQ Read 15.5
DQ Write 18.5
DQ Mixed 14.8
12% 16.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 102%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
194GB free
Firmware: AX0R5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 76 74 75 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 101
Write 91
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 75.2
54% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSK64W6H Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
36.2% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 11.9
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 44 60 34.1" 1280 720 GSM76F9 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical VC65 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VC65

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback