Asus VC65

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago, 7 months ago.

System	Asus VC65 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK VC65
Memory	5.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190429
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '23 at 11:58
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400T 8,631 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1151p, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 76 1-Core 76.2 2-Core 149 59% 100 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 284 30% 241 Pts	64-Core 284 18% 284 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Intel(8086 1912) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	2.8% Terrible	Lighting 5.1 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 5.9 4% 5.1 fps	MRender 0.3 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.1 0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.8% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 238GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 121 17 20 31 42 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.6% Poor	Read 135 Write 93.2 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 76.6 22% 96.5 MB/s	4K Read 10.3 4K Write 15.6 4K Mixed 8.9 35% 11.6 MB/s	DQ Read 16 DQ Write 16.7 DQ Mixed 14.8 12% 15.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 102%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$56 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 193GB free Firmware: AX0R5J SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 76 76 75 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 74.4 Write 72.4 Mixed 29 SusWrite 75.8 46% 62.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS1GSK64W6H Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 12GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 12.6 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 12.7 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 88.3 45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	40	5	60	34.1"	1280 720	GSM76F9 LG ULTRAWIDE

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VC65 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VC65

CPU
Core i3-6100TIntel $108Bench 58%, 6,076 samples	14x
Core i5-6400TIntelBench 61%, 8,631 samples	13x
Pentium G4400Intel $45Bench 47%, 36,432 samples	3x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	28x
HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 3%, 16,316 samples	3x

SSD
T34 256GB SSDEzlinkBench 75%, 9 samples	3x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	2x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	2x

RAM
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	5x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	3x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $108

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16