HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 836B
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170728
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateSep 12 '23 at 15:39
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 47.4
1-Core 71.6
2-Core 108
44% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 272
28% 225 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
HP(103C 836B) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3667
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 30
Parallax 22.7
16% 24.2 fps
MRender 31.8
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 16.8
18% 23.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
451GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1054 1094 358 124 306 295 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 1,135
Write 1,187
Mixed 1,143
SusWrite 538
225% 1,001 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 36.3
117% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 293
215% 284 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 127%
Great: 365%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 119 115 118 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 127
Write 114
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 116
69% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC Kingston 9905624-013.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 13.4
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1920 1080 LGD0532
Typical Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx Builds (Compare 2,480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback