Gigabyte GA-Z690 GAMING X DDR4 V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 174%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 190%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive336% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 GAMING X DDR4 V2  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '23 at 08:24
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600K-$260
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 81.6
1-Core 210
2-Core 412
121% 234 Pts
4-Core 774
8-Core 1,336
128% 1,055 Pts
64-Core 2,272
141% 2,272 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 113%
Great: 128%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
156% Outstanding
Lighting 232
Reflection 219
Parallax 198
189% 216 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 154
Splatting 141
133% 166 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 156%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
680GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1480 1112 1040 1052 1030 1033 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 2,490
Write 2167
Mixed 1679
SusWrite 1,124
417% 1,865 MB/s
4K Read 65
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 94.7
324% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,634
DQ Write 1,398
DQ Mixed 1297
1,032% 1443 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 336%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
790GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 481 483 482 483 483 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 484
Mixed 460
SusWrite 482
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 49.3
160% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 341
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: M6CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 289 257 22 18 18 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.7% Average
Read 114
Write 244
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 148
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 7.5
75% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 9.9
48% 106 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 99%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
554GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1420 1433 1441 1435 1440 1439 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 1,490
Write 1,388
Mixed 1,074
SusWrite 1,434
303% 1,347 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 78.5
276% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 687
DQ Write 957
DQ Mixed 272
360% 639 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 269%
Great: 295%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121
3TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 192 193 192 191 190 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK Corsair CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK Corsair CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 64GB
3200, 3600, 3200, 3600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 24.8
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 29.4
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 KGN0ABC KAMN27RQ1LA
Typical GA-Z690 GAMING X DDR4 V2 Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 GAMING X DDR4 V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $640
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback