Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	98% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	343% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

9 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS XTREME
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF (all builds)
Memory	59.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '23 at 01:54
Run Duration	309 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$192 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 92.9 1-Core 150 2-Core 295 98% 179 Pts	4-Core 591 8-Core 910 93% 750 Pts	64-Core 1,186 73% 1,186 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$780 46,082 User benchmarks, average bench 240% PNY(196E 13B1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.67 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (120 fps cap detected)	98% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 120 Parallax 120 98% 120 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 120 Splatting 120 98% 120 fps
Poor: 208% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 256%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB 553 User benchmarks, average bench 321% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2125 2125 2121 2131 2119 2106 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	343% Outstanding	Read 2,349 Write 2,296 Mixed 2,224 SusWrite 2,121 507% 2,248 MB/s	4K Read 58.1 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 77.2 247% 82.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,073 DQ Write 821 DQ Mixed 982 725% 959 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 343% Great: 399%
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB 6,289 User benchmarks, average bench 360% 2.5TB free Firmware: P9CR40A SusWrite @10s intervals: 2361 2336 2322 1356 442 440 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	285% Outstanding	Read 1,926 Write 2,386 Mixed 2,069 SusWrite 1,543 448% 1,981 MB/s	4K Read 48.3 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 69.2 230% 82.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,123 DQ Write 767 DQ Mixed 999 731% 963 MB/s
Poor: 137% ↑ This bench: 285% Great: 530%
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB 6,289 User benchmarks, average bench 360% 2.5TB free Firmware: P9CR40A SusWrite @10s intervals: 1406 1114 302 302 302 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	203% Outstanding	Read 1,254 Write 1,401 Mixed 1,287 SusWrite 621 257% 1,141 MB/s	4K Read 46.5 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 67.8 223% 79.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,108 DQ Write 932 DQ Mixed 1,004 756% 1,015 MB/s
Poor: 137% ↑ This bench: 203% Great: 530%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$71 8,846 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 176 176 176 175 174 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 172 Mixed 80.1 SusWrite 176 111% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87 14,331 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 5.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 159 159 155 154 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 93.4 Write 119 Mixed 75 SusWrite 156 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.9 270% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 87%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 8TB 285 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2.5TB free, PID 25f6 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 230 226 207 227 236 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Read 235 Write 158 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 224 204% 161 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 36% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x16GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.9% Very good	MC Read 27.7 MC Write 30.4 MC Mixed 25 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 34.8 SC Mixed 26.7 76% 26.7 GB/s	Latency 62.4 64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 143%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	60	48.9"	1280 720	SAM0E5D C49HG9x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	308x
Core i9-9900KSIntelBench 99%, 12,840 samples	29x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $292Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	22x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	99x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	44x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	34x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	62x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	38x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	23x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	25x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	11x
CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 91%, 18,655 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,068

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16