Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 98% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	98% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	345% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

10 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS XTREME
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF (all builds)
Memory	58.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211105
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '23 at 01:38
Run Duration	309 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$191 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	Memory 92.3 1-Core 148 2-Core 293 98% 178 Pts	4-Core 547 8-Core 915 89% 731 Pts	64-Core 1153 71% 1153 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$765 46,082 User benchmarks, average bench 240% PNY(196E 13B1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 3195 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.67 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (120 fps cap detected)	98% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 120 Parallax 120 98% 120 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 120 Splatting 120 98% 120 fps
Poor: 208% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 256%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB 553 User benchmarks, average bench 321% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2155 2162 2163 2142 2145 2157 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	345% Outstanding	Read 2,379 Write 2,319 Mixed 2,222 SusWrite 2,154 511% 2,268 MB/s	4K Read 58.5 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 77.4 248% 83.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1045 DQ Write 803 DQ Mixed 961 709% 936 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 345% Great: 399%
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB 6,289 User benchmarks, average bench 360% 2.5TB free Firmware: P9CR40A SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 441 450 447 442 1742 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	231% Outstanding	Read 1,968 Write 2,396 Mixed 2,088 SusWrite 659 400% 1,778 MB/s	4K Read 47.9 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 68.9 229% 82 MB/s	DQ Read 1,094 DQ Write 757 DQ Mixed 995 724% 949 MB/s
Poor: 137% ↑ This bench: 231% Great: 530%
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB 6,289 User benchmarks, average bench 360% 2.5TB free Firmware: P9CR40A SusWrite @10s intervals: 1411 1408 1420 1412 1410 1420 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	252% Outstanding	Read 1,268 Write 1420 Mixed 1,333 SusWrite 1,414 307% 1,359 MB/s	4K Read 47.7 4K Write 125 4K Mixed 67.7 225% 80.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,086 DQ Write 923 DQ Mixed 984 743% 998 MB/s
Poor: 137% ↑ This bench: 252% Great: 530%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$70 8,846 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 176 177 176 175 175 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 168 Mixed 85.6 SusWrite 176 111% 152 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87 14,331 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 5.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 156 158 154 156 161 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Read 134 Write 104 Mixed 74.4 SusWrite 156 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.9 249% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 87%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 8TB 285 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2.5TB free, PID 25f6 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 230 224 218 232 229 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Read 209 Write 238 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 226 231% 175 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 33% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x16GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	80.1% Excellent	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 24.7 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 33.7 SC Mixed 26.1 75% 26.1 GB/s	Latency 63.6 63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 143%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 17: 0P 1R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
17%	7%	99	133	101	60	48.9"	1280 720	SAM0E5D C49HG9x

History: Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B | Score 34: 0P 3R 6G 1B | Score 17: 0P 1R 3G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $415Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	308x
Core i9-9900KSIntelBench 99%, 12,840 samples	29x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $274Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	22x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	100x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	44x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	34x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	63x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $142Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	38x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	23x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $129Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	25x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	11x
CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 91%, 18,655 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,089

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16