Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 224%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 200%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics252% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS XTREME
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF  (all builds)
Memory59.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 05:58
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 129
2-Core 260
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 776
78% 636 Pts
64-Core 956
59% 956 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$773
PNY(196E 13B1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Lighting 370
Reflection 352
Parallax 380
302% 368 fps
MRender 499
Gravity 307
Splatting 221
266% 342 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 252%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1977 2004 2011 2097 2086 2092 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2,330
Write 2,244
Mixed 2,141
SusWrite 2,044
494% 2,190 MB/s
4K Read 55.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 72.4
231% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 957
DQ Write 739
DQ Mixed 904
661% 866 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 328%
Great: 399%
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1351 1466 1463 1476 1484 1486 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 140
Write 447
Mixed 197
SusWrite 1,454
129% 560 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 3.6
42% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 374
DQ Mixed 287
227% 312 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 121%
Great: 530%
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1101 1185 1182 1181 1177 1181 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,235
Write 1,397
Mixed 1,304
SusWrite 1,168
288% 1276 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 64.9
214% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,030
DQ Write 853
DQ Mixed 930
700% 938 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 229%
Great: 530%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$71
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 175 175 177 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 167
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 175
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 103%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 152 157 156 151 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 91
Write 123
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 152
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.9
250% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 25.6
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 25.8
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 48.9" 1280 720 SAM0E5D C49HG9x
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,046
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback