Biostar H310MHP

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

9 months ago, 8 months ago.

Motherboard	Biostar H310MHP (all builds)
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190531
Uptime	4.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '23 at 09:20
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	BLR-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 126 2-Core 249 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 418 52% 395 Pts	64-Core 423 26% 423 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.67 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	45% Average	Lighting 59.5 Reflection 57.3 Parallax 54.8 48% 57.2 fps	MRender 41.9 Gravity 51.9 Splatting 46.4 38% 46.7 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X1240G 240GB 3,895 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFMBB.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 345 251 31 362 29 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Read 427 Write 401 Mixed 372 SusWrite 238 81% 360 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 86.2 4K Mixed 43.2 154% 54.7 MB/s	DQ Read 255 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 205 177% 258 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 92%
SSD-120 120GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 112GB free Firmware: SBFM21.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 191 232 231 229 235 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Read 413 Write 416 Mixed 333 SusWrite 243 79% 351 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 29.4 141% 55.6 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 158 149% 227 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.M8FG 1x4GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	45.3% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 12.4 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 13.3 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 26: 0P 2R 4G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
26%	50%	20	193	15	60	27"	1920 1080	SAM0D32 C27F390

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310MHP Builds (Compare 1,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H310MHP

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	360x
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	288x
Core i5-9400Intel $160Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	134x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	94x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	55x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	67x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	36x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	31x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 2666 C16 2x4GBKingstonBench 82%, 4,742 samples	23x
BL8G32C16U4R.M8FE1 1x8GBUnknownBench 49%, 189 samples	16x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GBUnknownBench 43%, 5,242 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16