Huanan Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHuanan Default string  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '20 at 03:25
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 170
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 463
47% 383 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8439) 1GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.2% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 9.46
Parallax 12
8% 10.6 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 13.3
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.2%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 456
Write 324
Mixed 358
84% 380 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 48.5
158% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 342
260% 349 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.M8FG 1x4GB
1 of 16 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.6% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.3
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Default string Builds (Compare 946 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Huanan Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback