Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '21 at 15:43
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 75.7
1-Core 145
2-Core 288
91% 170 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 830
86% 694 Pts
64-Core 829
51% 829 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Lighting 69.5
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 93.3
57% 75.2 fps
MRender 62.2
Gravity 73.6
Splatting 46.8
48% 60.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0B-00YS70 250GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 508
Write 446
Mixed 272
91% 408 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 52.5
188% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 212
179% 260 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 105%
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
95GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 134 136 41 135 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.4% Poor
Read 180
Write 88.5
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 118
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 10.8
48% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 14.3
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 14.6
11% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3250620AS 250GB-$149
231GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 73 68 73 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 72.8
Write 49
Mixed 46
SusWrite 72.2
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 43%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 64GB-$30
34GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 8.2 4.9 4 3.5 3.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 19.2
Write 7.7
Mixed 1.3
SusWrite 5.2
9% 8.35 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Mixed 0
30% 2.65 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.M8FG 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 16.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback