Toshiba SATELLITE C50-A-146

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

11 months ago, 11 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 7 months ago, 6 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C50-A-146 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PT10F
Memory	3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '23 at 10:07
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	76%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 1005M 3,385 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Memory 52.5 1-Core 42.4 2-Core 50.4 33% 48.4 Pts	4-Core 61.2 8-Core 65.7 8% 63.4 Pts	64-Core 65 4% 65 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz) 28,701 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FA31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.26% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 2 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.6 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.8 2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.26% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB 5,922 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06H6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 329 357 367 359 423 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 290 Write 176 Mixed 224 SusWrite 354 59% 261 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 35.4 4K Mixed 22.3 75% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 131 104% 146 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB 1,325 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	21% Poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 4.7 19% 6.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 9.1 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	36	28	60	15.5"	1280 720	LGD033A

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C50-A-146 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C50-A-146

CPU
Celeron 1005MIntelBench 44%, 3,385 samples	14x
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	14x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	2x

SSD
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	5x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	1x
AS350 256GBApacerBench 70%, 5,875 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173BH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,473 samples	4x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,325 samples	2x
M471B5273EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 29%, 749 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16