MSI B450M PRO-M2 MAX (MS-7B84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive26.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B84
MotherboardMSI B450M PRO-M2 MAX (MS-7B84)  (all builds)
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime19.1 Days
Run DateMar 30 '22 at 21:23
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 76.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 241
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 794
77% 633 Pts
64-Core 1,260
78% 1,260 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$429
Nvidia(10DE 13A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.9% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 109
Parallax 126
97% 118 fps
MRender 173
Gravity 112
Splatting 104
103% 130 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Emtec X150 480GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200Id10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 11 59 13 25 11 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.3% Poor
Read 199
Write 100
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 45.8
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 10.5
50% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 14.1
DQ Write 15.2
DQ Mixed 14.5
11% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 99%
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 40 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.8% Very poor
Read 41.9
Write 40
Mixed 41
SusWrite 39.4
9% 40.6 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 12.8
43% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.8
DQ Write 28.4
DQ Mixed 16.9
16% 25 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 105%
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: DXM06H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 406 422 429 435 435 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 450
Mixed 381
SusWrite 430
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 43.3
150% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 175
176% 287 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
67GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,449
Write 2,481
Mixed 2,319
540% 2,416 MB/s
4K Read 68.3
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 89.6
289% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 987
DQ Write 872
DQ Mixed 938
701% 932 MB/s
Poor: 206% Great: 442%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$114
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 189 187 187 189 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 192
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 187
109% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 25.1
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 24.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M PRO-M2 MAX (MS-7B84) Builds (Compare 3,849 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450M PRO-M2 MAX (MS-7B84)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $421
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $285Nvidia RTX 4060 $285Crucial MX500 250GB $32
Intel Core i5-12400F $149Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $340Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $46Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $346SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback