Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C50-A-146 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PT10F
Memory	3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '23 at 13:26
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	99%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 1005M 3,385 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Memory 51.6 1-Core 29.5 2-Core 78 33% 53 Pts	4-Core 62.2 8-Core 60.3 8% 61.2 Pts	64-Core 57 4% 57 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz) 28,701 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FA31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.25% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 1.3 1% 1.33 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.83 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.25% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB 5,922 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06H6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 335 342 232 257 205 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42% Average	Read 261 Write 136 Mixed 140 SusWrite 280 46% 204 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 11.7 4K Mixed 13.2 27% 9.23 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 116 87% 116 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB 1,325 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 10.9 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 6.7 15% 5.3 GB/s	Latency 155 26% 155 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron 1005MIntelBench 44%, 3,385 samples	14x
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	14x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	2x

SSD
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	5x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	1x
AS350 256GBApacerBench 70%, 5,875 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173BH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,473 samples	4x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,325 samples	2x
M471B5273EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 29%, 749 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16