Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506HF
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230720
Uptime2 Days
Run DateSep 08 '23 at 15:56
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Memory 44.8
1-Core 37.3
2-Core 74.9
32% 52.3 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 259
23% 196 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 3088) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.24% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 32.9
Parallax 0.6
0% 11.2 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.24%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
303GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1097 919 237 171 220 229 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 980
Write 1,271
Mixed 928
SusWrite 479
206% 915 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 29.5
98% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 291
217% 288 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 112%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N Kingston KF3200C20S4/8G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
76.6% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 28
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 7.5
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0P 1R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 3% 100 212 64 60 15.5" 1296 759 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF Builds (Compare 849 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback