Asus ASUSLaptop_Q540VJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUSLaptop_Q540VJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K6502VJ
Memory15.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230525
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 07 '23 at 03:19
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 58.2
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 163
59% 105 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 590
52% 442 Pts
64-Core 1,100
68% 1,100 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 3158) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 22.4
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 26.4
18% 24.5 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 32.1
Splatting 20.7
21% 25.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2450_MTFDKBA1T0TFK 1TB
807GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,057
Write 1,028
Mixed 1,063
235% 1,049 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 44.8
154% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 583
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 439
315% 413 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 351%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMSX16GX5M1A4800C40 Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 24GB
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
73.1% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 26
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 16.6
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 120 15.5" 1646 926 SDC4180
Typical ASUSLaptop_Q540VJ Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Asus ASUSLaptop_Q540VJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback