TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 82TF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics83.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive469% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82TF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory18.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '23 at 01:38
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 70.3
1-Core 168
2-Core 356
102% 198 Pts
4-Core 663
8-Core 1,034
105% 849 Pts
64-Core 1,838
114% 1,838 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑
This bench: 97.1%
 Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3803) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.99
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.4% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 116
Parallax 106
87% 109 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 83.3
Splatting 76.1
76% 95.9 fps
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 83.4%
 Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2774 2892 3039 3397 3323 3404 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
469% Outstanding
Read 2,294
Write 1,979
Mixed 2,738
SusWrite 3,138
574% 2,537 MB/s
4K Read 70.2
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 114
360% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,758
DQ Write 1,539
DQ Mixed 1,646
1,234% 1,647 MB/s
Poor: 283% ↑
This bench: 469%
 Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMSX16GX5M1A4800C40 Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 24GB
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 59.5
MC Write 47.3
MC Mixed 48.5
148% 51.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 45.9
SC Mixed 27.5
88% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 134%
 Great: 134%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 165 16" 1280 720 TMX1602 TL160VDMP01
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 82TF Builds (Compare 601 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Lenovo 82TF

CPU
Core i7-12700HIntelBench 97%, 52,857 samples564x
Core i5-12500HIntelBench 94%, 11,588 samples22x
Core i9-12900HIntelBench 99%, 15,403 samples12x
GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples308x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples232x
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples40x
SSD
MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL2 512GBSamsungBench 294%, 2,322 samples137x
SKHynix_HFS512GEJ9X115N 512GBBench 342%, 1,595 samples123x
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ9X115N 1TBBench 439%, 1,257 samples108x
RAM
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 16GBSamsungBench 119%, 1,385 samples198x
MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 16GBMicronBench 121%, 503 samples106x
CT32G48C40S5.M16A1 Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 39GBCrucialBench 108%, 161 samples36x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback