MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B48
MotherboardMSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '23 at 03:44
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 82.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 250
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 643
71% 562 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31% Below average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 36.9
33% 38.9 fps
MRender 34.8
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 26.4
27% 33.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$32
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 175 102 103 103 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 195
Write 104
Mixed 339
SusWrite 161
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 33.8
131% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 209
185% 276 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 91%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
38GB free
Firmware: SBFK66.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 402 106 105 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 430
Write 176
Mixed 365
SusWrite 203
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 38
138% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 223
194% 288 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 102%
256gb SSD 256GB
54GB free
Firmware: H190117H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 428 271 262 257 258 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 355
Mixed 442
SusWrite 317
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 43.3
155% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 319
238% 316 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 167%
Faspeed K7-1TB-CD 1TB
756GB free
Firmware: U1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 218 213 343 428 430 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 441
Write 219
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 307
57% 258 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 0.6
44% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 0.6
48% 115 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 91%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
829GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 96 95 94 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 93.5
Write 65
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 95.4
103% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-017.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
68% Good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 21.2
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 20
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 23.8" 1280 720 VSC623B VX2418-P FHD
Typical Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) Builds (Compare 16,747 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) - $249

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $665
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback