Huananzhi X99-T8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHuananzhi X99-T8  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-T8
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210314
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 03 '23 at 01:39
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 76.8
2-Core 141
60% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 612
56% 469 Pts
64-Core 1,229
76% 1,229 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 19.9
17% 19.3 fps
MRender 23.9
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 16
16% 20.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu F510S 120GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 63 62 59 61 60 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 364
Write 245
Mixed 281
SusWrite 89.4
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 21
94% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 173
150% 219 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 64%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 179 179 173 179 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 91
Mixed 108
SusWrite 178
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CMA 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (83rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.4% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.8
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 12 70 0" 1280 720
Typical X99-T8 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Huananzhi X99-T8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback