Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI (all builds)
Memory	18.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210427
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	May 23 '23 at 12:26
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Memory 81.7 1-Core 109 2-Core 216 76% 136 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 617 62% 503 Pts	64-Core 898 56% 898 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 3670) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.5% Average	Lighting 56.8 Reflection 61.4 Parallax 54.8 46% 57.7 fps	MRender 59.4 Gravity 56.2 Splatting 47.8 44% 54.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 256GB 9,539 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: VC0S0328 SusWrite @10s intervals: 831 862 855 776 205 107 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 1,611 Write 811 Mixed 886 SusWrite 606 217% 979 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 75.6 4K Mixed 38 130% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 523 DQ Write 699 DQ Mixed 621 466% 614 MB/s
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 228%
Fujitsu F510S 120GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 79GB free Firmware: SBFM61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 76 63 62 63 62 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 384 Write 323 Mixed 277 SusWrite 108 61% 273 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 62.4 4K Mixed 23 101% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 166 152% 228 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 64%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 13GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 120 127 105 79 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 104 Write 98.2 Mixed 72.1 SusWrite 86 66% 90.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0 82% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 KF3200C16D4/8GX Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 32GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2400, 3200, 2400, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 23.1 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 24.6 SC Mixed 17.7 52% 18.1 GB/s	Latency 77.4 52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 110%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	295x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	248x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	204x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	302x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	261x
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 94%, 22,102 samples	221x

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $525

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16