MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics90.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B45
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170901
Uptime4 Days
Run DateSep 01 '23 at 13:25
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 86.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 210
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 658
70% 559 Pts
64-Core 686
42% 686 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
MSI(1462 C307) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.4% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 128
Parallax 118
92% 120 fps
MRender 90.6
Gravity 118
Splatting 108
87% 106 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 101%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
MSI(1462 7B45) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.85% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 7.4
5% 7.57 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 10.6
7% 8.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.85%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 486
Write 417
Mixed 402
97% 435 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 1.2
54% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 48.4
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 44.9
43% 66.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
364GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 604 607 615 599 619 612 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 457
Write 574
Mixed 439
SusWrite 609
118% 520 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 33.1
104% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 369
265% 339 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 102%
Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
425GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 139 143 141 142 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 158
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 141
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.8
342% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 210 212 208 208 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 199
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 208
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
234% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 107%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 187 186 185 185 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 157
Mixed 80.1
SusWrite 186
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB Kingston KHX2133C14D4/4G M378A5143DB0-CPB Kingston KHX2133C14D4/4G 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
75.6% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 24.1
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 21.6
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 24 144 23.8" 1280 720 AUS242C ASUS VG24VQ1B
Typical Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) Builds (Compare 3,991 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,012
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback