Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics90.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '23 at 10:30
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8086K-$443
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Memory 95.5
96% 95.5 Pts
Poor: 81% Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Asus(1043 8866) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.1% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 145
Parallax 99.9
91% 119 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 97.2
Splatting 93.4
88% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1444 1555 1597 1620 1620 1525 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2,312
Write 1,662
Mixed 937
SusWrite 1560
361% 1,618 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 57.2
188% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 511
DQ Mixed 596
462% 639 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 276%
Great: 353%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$166
6TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 219 225 228 228 228 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate ST12000NE0008-2J 12TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 166 168 164 168 168 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate ST14000VN0008-2JG101 14TB
9.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 238 224 222 234 244 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 2% Great: 104%
Seagate ST4000DX001-1CE1 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 168 169 168 169 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 120
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 168
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
364% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST10000VN0004-1Z 10TB
5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 197 198 199 200 198 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate ST4000DX001-1CE1 4TB
993GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 139 139 139 139 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 110
Write 117
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 139
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
364% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST18000NE000-2YY101 18TB
6TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 180 180 181 180 180 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 29.1
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 45.5
SC Mixed 30
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 55.6
72% 55.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 101%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 31.5" 1280 720 MTC0000 100068372
Typical ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING Builds (Compare 15,789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING - $339

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback