Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics93.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive273% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '23 at 12:59
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8086K-$443
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 279
89% 162 Pts
4-Core 607
8-Core 916
94% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,162
72% 1,162 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 104%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Asus(1043 8866) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.8% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 151
Parallax 104
95% 124 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 101
Splatting 97.5
92% 115 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1522 1573 1582 1605 1617 1603 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 2,247
Write 1,651
Mixed 878
SusWrite 1,584
355% 1,590 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 54.2
184% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 814
DQ Write 528
DQ Mixed 597
465% 646 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 273%
Great: 353%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$166
6TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 225 229 227 228 227 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate ST12000NE0008-2J 12TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 184 189 186 188 187 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate ST14000VN0008-2JG101 14TB
9.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 242 227 223 232 241 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 2% Great: 104%
Seagate ST4000DX001-1CE1 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 145 146 146 147 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 39.8
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 146
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.8
338% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 102%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST10000VN0004-1Z 10TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 140 141 141 142 142 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate ST4000DX001-1CE1 4TB
993GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 161 161 160 161 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 111
Write 155
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 161
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.9
351% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST18000NE000-2YY101 18TB
6TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 182 183 179 182 179 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 29.2
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 44.5
SC Mixed 29.6
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 57.9
69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 101%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 31.5" 1280 720 MTC0000 100068372
Typical ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING Builds (Compare 15,793 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING - $339

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback