MSI 970A-G43 (MS-7693)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive29.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970A-G43 (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '23 at 18:07
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$127
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 144
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 397
41% 330 Pts
64-Core 411
25% 411 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$283
Nvidia(10DE 1530) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 126
Parallax 128
116% 132 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 99.6
Splatting 95.1
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Simm 2.5 SATA 240GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0524A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 72 52 55 52 55 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.6% Poor
Read 87.4
Write 173
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 54
23% 100 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 12.3
71% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 19.8
DQ Write 65.9
DQ Mixed 11.2
18% 32.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
243GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 104 106 105 107 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 90.1
Write 96
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 104
65% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
332GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 86 53 55 54 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 137
Write 149
Mixed 77.9
SusWrite 59.7
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
378GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 69 70 70 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
49% Average
Read 100
Write 81.7
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 70.5
55% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.1% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 18.9
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 14.5
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 0P 3R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 64% 14 193 26 0 32" 1280 720 SKY0030 TV MONITOR
Typical 970A-G43 (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970A-G43 (MS-7693) - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $257
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback