Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 223%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 255%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics223% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '23 at 17:46
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 75.1
1-Core 176
2-Core 352
105% 201 Pts
4-Core 687
8-Core 1,335
120% 1,011 Pts
64-Core 2,231
138% 2,231 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Lighting 333
Reflection 302
Parallax 342
272% 326 fps
MRender 372
Gravity 268
Splatting 196
218% 278 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 223%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 952 910 881 870 850 857 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 2,552
Write 2480
Mixed 1,870
SusWrite 887
436% 1,947 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 81.2
263% 90.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,268
DQ Write 1,027
DQ Mixed 1,180
875% 1,158 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 289%
Great: 355%
Amd-raid SanDisk S3 1TB
385GB free
Firmware: 4010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 191 185 188 187 186 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 318
Write 420
Mixed 215
SusWrite 188
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 16.2
75% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 88.8
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 83.8
80% 122 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53%
Great: 75%
Amd-raid SanDisk SSD PLUS 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: UG50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 185 100 166 169 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 330
Write 330
Mixed 266
SusWrite 162
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 27.4
4K Mixed 11.1
42% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 54.7
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 24.9
34% 60.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 46%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
466GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1152 1139 774 771 770 766 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,385
Write 1190
Mixed 1,174
SusWrite 895
261% 1,161 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 77.1
249% 85 MB/s
DQ Read 1,287
DQ Write 1,183
DQ Mixed 1231
925% 1,234 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 243%
Great: 355%
Amd-raid Array 4 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 184 180 181 182 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 183
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 182
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.5
149% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 101%
Great: 190%
BUFFALO HD-PCFU3 1TB
474GB free, PID 0240
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 214 216 204 203 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 365
Write 332
Mixed 152
SusWrite 218
342% 267 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 14.3
925% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 14.9
DQ Write 17.1
DQ Mixed 15.2
1,154% 15.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 139%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
MC Read 60
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 27.4
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 25
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 168%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 100 35" 1280 720 GSM7756 LG HDR WQHD
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI Builds (Compare 6,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $970
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback