Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6  (all builds)
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '23 at 11:36
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 230
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 901
79% 673 Pts
64-Core 2,109
130% 2,109 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Gigabyte(1458 4073) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.9% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 116
Parallax 121
106% 122 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 98.6
Splatting 86.1
86% 108 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot M.2 P300 1024GB
808GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400fAA13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 108 94 96 95 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 930
Write 195
Mixed 125
SusWrite 94.9
72% 336 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 45
127% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 493
DQ Mixed 438
328% 431 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 103%
Great: 329%
Team T253X1960G 960GB
791GB free
Firmware: S0830A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 405 407 418 420 421 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 464
Write 422
Mixed 379
SusWrite 396
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 27.2
116% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 48.8
91% 176 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
168% Outstanding
MC Read 67.4
MC Write 68.1
MC Mixed 65.5
191% 67 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 41.2
SC Mixed 27.8
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 168%
Great: 168%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Phantom Gaming 6 Builds (Compare 229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Phantom Gaming 6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $1,165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback