Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 101% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 101% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	455% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	43.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200724
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '20 at 20:59
Run Duration	264 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Memory 81.7 1-Core 152 2-Core 305 96% 179 Pts	4-Core 528 8-Core 919 88% 724 Pts	64-Core 1,373 85% 1,373 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3702) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Lighting 137 Reflection 150 Parallax 136 112% 141 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 141 Splatting 124 105% 128 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80 15,656 User benchmarks, average bench 339% 870GB free (System drive) Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3497 3659 3742 3753 3746 3738 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	455% Outstanding	Read 2,090 Write 3,545 Mixed 2,196 SusWrite 3,689 655% 2,880 MB/s	4K Read 50.1 4K Write 180 4K Mixed 84.8 280% 105 MB/s	DQ Read 1,443 DQ Write 1,194 DQ Mixed 1,319 988% 1,319 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 455% Great: 491%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 850 500GB 232 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 121GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 325 343 378 300 288 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Read 402 Write 383 Mixed 327 SusWrite 325 81% 360 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 52 4K Mixed 34.7 113% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 92 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 113 88% 119 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 99%
Amd-raid WDC WD20EZRX-00D 2TB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 118 117 134 113 99 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 106 Write 132 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 114 69% 95.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.5 90% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 84%
Amd-raid Array 4 4TB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2TB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 78 70 89 72 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 56.5 Write 84.1 Mixed 53.1 SusWrite 77.9 50% 67.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 190%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 16GB 901 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 10GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 7.3 5.7 6.3 6.2 6.1 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 39.5 Write 18 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 8 18% 16.8 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.1 104% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 24%
Kingston DT 100 G2 16GB 1,132 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 1653 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.8 8.7 8.7 8.4 8.7 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	8.31% Terrible	Read 24.7 Write 7 Mixed 7 SusWrite 8.6 13% 11.8 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.7 64% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.31% Great: 8%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 1GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 0GB free, PID 652d, Toshiba 1GB Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 20.2 Write 17.2 Mixed 15.5 22% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 57% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 48GB 204 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	MC Read 37.4 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 37.4 94% 32.9 GB/s	SC Read 27.1 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 37.8 84% 29.5 GB/s	Latency 77.4 52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $475

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,916x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,341x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	1,104x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,103x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	879x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	611x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	846x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	707x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	421x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	434x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	185x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,740

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16