Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221117
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 29 '23 at 17:12
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 64.5
1-Core 145
2-Core 287
87% 166 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 624
58% 483 Pts
64-Core 614
38% 614 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4644
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 8.7
6% 8.2 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 2.9
5% 6.83 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memoirestek G600 1TB
584GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0221B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 2 2.5 1.5 1.9 1.5 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 390
Write 378
Mixed 370
SusWrite 36.5
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 16.6
88% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 32.5
82% 169 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 91%
SH00R2TB 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: U1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 395 396 400 383 384 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 453
Write 407
Mixed 389
SusWrite 396
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 23
108% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 44.1
92% 184 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Avant J644GU44J2320NQ 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 15.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 15.6
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 23.8" 1280 720 SAM7096 LF24T450F
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback