Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230109
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 09 '23 at 10:48
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 52.6
1-Core 149
2-Core 300
85% 167 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 718
80% 627 Pts
64-Core 1,140
71% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3616
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 21.2
15% 19.3 fps
MRender 17.5
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 10.4
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memoirestek G600 1TB
898GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0221B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 329 305 295 327 325 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 408
Write 344
Mixed 353
SusWrite 318
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 11.5
68% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 33.8
74% 147 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KINSOTIN16GB2666MHZ 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
33.9% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 10.9
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 10.2
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 16" 1280 720 CSO1610
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback