MSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A69
MotherboardMSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)  (all builds)
Memory33 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '23 at 12:02
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 186
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 275
36% 271 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.1% Good
Lighting 78.5
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 82.7
64% 79.2 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 72.8
Splatting 58.8
53% 65 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 513 317 333 325 333 329 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,957
Write 1,445
Mixed 1,095
SusWrite 358
269% 1,214 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 49.8
171% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 420
DQ Write 405
DQ Mixed 445
325% 423 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 171%
Great: 280%
EVM SSD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: W0529A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 372 397 435 439 442 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 173
Write 178
Mixed 122
SusWrite 391
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 7
50% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 31.5
80% 162 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 242%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
114GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 165 168 170 168 170 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
74% Very good
Read 89.4
Write 75
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 167
65% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2
362% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 Kingston KHX2400C15D4/16GX 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 40GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.7% Very good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 24.7
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 22.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 21.5" 1920 1009 AOC2281 2281W
Typical B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69) Builds (Compare 1,869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI B250M MORTAR (MS-7A69)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback