Asus PRIME A320M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-A  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '23 at 18:31
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 77.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 245
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 668
70% 564 Pts
64-Core 936
58% 936 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.6% Very good
Lighting 99.6
Reflection 103
Parallax 152
81% 118 fps
MRender 88.3
Gravity 113
Splatting 74.3
74% 91.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 665 329 324 321 313 310 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 2,536
Write 1,101
Mixed 1,826
SusWrite 377
323% 1,460 MB/s
4K Read 62.6
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 82.3
273% 93.9 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 807
DQ Mixed 874
658% 883 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 249%
Great: 340%
Team T253LE240G 240GB
222GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 155 80 80 79 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 496
Write 430
Mixed 372
SusWrite 143
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 34.7
140% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 193
176% 265 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 93%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
636GB free
Firmware: EB01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 99 99 100 100 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 66
Write 105
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 96.5
60% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 71%
Fujitsu MHW2160BH 160GB
32GB free
Firmware: 0000001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 45 45 45 44 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
25% Poor
Read 42.2
Write 43.5
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 44.7
29% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 25%
Great: 26%
Fujitsu MHZ2160BH G1 160GB
145GB free
Firmware: 0040020C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 58 58 57 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 58.9
Write 52.9
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 57.5
38% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GF2400C16N2 CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 CM4X8GF2400C16N2 Adata DDR4 3000 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 28
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 28
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 75 27" 1920 1080 HPN3830 HP V27i G5
Typical PRIME A320M-A Builds (Compare 547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $274
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback