Today's hottest deals

MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C09
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 18:37
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$107
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 236
77% 142 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 445
59% 442 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.1.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 22.3
14% 22.2 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 25.5
19% 22.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253LE240G 240GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMBB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 170 66 33 36 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 373
Write 238
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 83.1
39% 179 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 10
54% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 44.6
DQ Write 14.2
DQ Mixed 17.1
16% 25.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
305GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 148 153 153 160 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 137
Write 159
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 152
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 029E CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
63.7% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 20.5
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) Builds (Compare 6,698 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $326
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback