User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics99.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFUJITSU
MotherboardFUJITSU D3401-H2
Memory53.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 01:46
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 193
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 484
50% 403 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.1% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 136
Parallax 125
101% 128 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 128
Splatting 113
95% 116 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MU031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 361 353 241 239 239 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 352
Write 258
Mixed 305
SusWrite 294
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 24.5
80% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 321
243% 327 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 101%
WDC WUH721816ALE6L0 16TB
11.5TB free
Firmware: PCGNT870
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 222 232 227 226 229 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 185
Write 212
Mixed 97.1
SusWrite 226
41% 180 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 1.3
10% 4.27 MB/s
DQ Read 2.3
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 0.5
2% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 32%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: M0MU031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 361 377 386 382 384 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 308
Write 226
Mixed 230
SusWrite 371
64% 283 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 23.9
79% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 321
239% 316 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 101%
Toshiba MG08ACA16TEY 16TB
15TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 236 243 247 249 252 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 51% Great: 141%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.C16FBR 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 21.2
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 13.5
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 120 21.7" 1280 720 XMD009A Mi TV
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback